Case 2409181/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Patel of Counsel For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2409181/2020
- Decision date
- 3 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr D Patel of Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Manchester by CVP before Employment Judge A M Buchanan sitting alone, dealt with Ms J Restall's claim against First Trenitalia West Coast Rail Limited. The only adjudicated claim recorded in the judgment was a breach of contract claim for unpaid holiday pay.
The tribunal held that the breach of contract claim was well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £5,097.62 forthwith. The judgment states that this sum represented unpaid holiday pay outstanding at the termination of employment.
The award was made as a gross payment, with the respondent required to deduct income tax and national insurance contributions properly payable before making payment to the claimant and to account for those deductions to the appropriate authorities. The judgment notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claim well-founded in respect of unpaid holiday pay outstanding at termination. The award was stated to be a gross payment, with income tax and national insurance to be deducted before payment. | Upheld | — | £5,098 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,098
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.