Case 2409181/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Stagg v Edmundson Electrical Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2409181/2021
- Decision date
- 23 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Stagg
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe final hearing took place in Manchester on 20 September 2022, heard in public via CVP. Mr J Stagg did not attend and was not represented. Edmundson Electrical Ltd was represented by Mr Ryan Watson, Consultant. The claimant’s application to postpone the final hearing was refused.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment records only a global finding that the claim was not well-founded and dismissed. The specific head of claim is taken from the case listing; the written record does not give separate findings for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment records only a global finding that the claim was not well-founded and dismissed. The specific head of claim is taken from the case listing; the written record does not give separate findings for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.