Case 2409186/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A McGuinness v Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409186/2021
- Decision date
- 13 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
- Panel members
- Ms J Pennie, Mr A Wells
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A McGuinness
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was a Senior Nurse Practitioner who had impaired cognitive ability following a brain haemorrhage. The respondent accepted that he was disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 and knew of his disability. Access to Work had recommended equipment, software, training and noise cancelling headphones to address disadvantages arising from his memory, concentration and multitasking difficulties.
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to take reasonable steps to provide the recommended auxiliary aids and relevant training within a reasonable time. It also found that the respondent should have ensured the claimant did not perform caseload holder duties until the equipment and training were in place, and that relying on the claimant to tell colleagues about that restriction was not sufficient.
The tribunal concluded that the claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments was brought within the Equality Act 2010 time limits. It found that failures to chase the outstanding aids and training continued into 2021, and that the March 2021 decision not to take further action to inform team leaders and coordinators was within time after ACAS Early Conciliation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal upheld the claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments, including failure to provide auxiliary aids. The supplied PDF text is truncated and contains no remedy award. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Equality Act 2010 sections 20 and 21
- Equality Act 2010 section 123
- Equality Act 2010 section 20(3)
- Equality Act 2010 section 123(3)(b)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.