Miss L Potter v Home Office — 2022

Case reference: 2409190/2021
Decision date: 10 October 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Phil Allen

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss L Potter

Respondent

Home Office

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal struck out the claim. By letter dated 23 May 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant's executor an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.

The claimant's executor failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment text does not set out the individual heads of claim; this classification follows the listing category supplied in the case context.	Struck out	—	—
Disability discrimination	The judgment states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment text does not set out the individual heads of claim; this classification follows the listing category supplied in the case context.	Struck out	Disability	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.