Case 2409204/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Smith v Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 2409204/2023
- Decision date
- 14 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that, by a letter dated 5 December 2025, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The hearing fixed for 30 June 2025 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s); it only records that 'the claim' was struck out for non-pursuit. The text also contains date inconsistencies ('5th December 2025' and '30th June 2025' despite an approval date of 09 January 2025), so I have not relied on those dates beyond the strike-out reason. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.