Case 2409216/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Henderson v The Rising Sun Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2409216/2020
- Decision date
- 20 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Henderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered a Rule 21 judgment for Ms J Henderson against The Rising Sun Limited. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £504.42. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages in the net sum of £197.04.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £197.04. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s outstanding holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £367.80. The attached notice explained the tribunal interest regime, but the judgment text did not state any quantified interest award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages; gross sum awarded. | Upheld | — | £504 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded in a net sum. | Upheld | — | £197 |
| Redundancy | Claimant found to have been dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £197 |
| Holiday pay | Outstanding holiday entitlement; gross sum awarded. | Upheld | — | £368 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,266
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.