Case 2409228/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Pollitt v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2409228/2020
- Decision date
- 25 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Pollitt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew her claims. Following that withdrawal, the Employment Tribunal dismissed the proceedings.
The judgment does not record any findings on the merits of the claims, any legal tests applied, or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant; it does not set out the individual claim details. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant; it does not set out the individual claim details. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant; it does not set out the individual claim details. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant; it does not set out the individual claim details. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.