Case 2409232/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Lewis v Salford Van Hire Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2409232/2021
- Decision date
- 13 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Lewis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Lewis brought claims against Salford Van Hire Limited in the Employment Tribunal at Manchester. On 13 December 2021, Employment Judge Sharkett held that none of the claimant's claims were presented within the primary three-month time limit and that the period was not extended by Early Conciliation.
The Tribunal also found that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to submit the claims within the prescribed time limit. On that basis, the Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claims. The extracted judgment records no substantive merits findings and no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the individual causes of action in the text provided. The Tribunal found that none of the claimant's claims were submitted within the primary three-month time limit, that Early Conciliation did not extend time, and that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claims within the prescribed time limit, so the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear them. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.