Case 2409271/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D P Morrison v Unity Service Group Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2409271/2023
- Decision date
- 4 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D P Morrison
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr D P Morrison’s claim against Unity Service Group Ltd (in compulsory liquidation). Employment Judge KM Ross recorded that the respondent company was in compulsory liquidation and that permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to continue, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also noted that on 9 June 2025 it gave the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the claim should be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying employment complaint or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify or determine the underlying substantive claims; it records that the claim was struck out because the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and permission of the court had not been obtained to continue the proceedings, and because the claimant did not give an acceptable reason after being invited on 9 June 2025 to explain why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.