Case 2409284/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Rehana Patel v East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 2409284/2020
- Decision date
- 13 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Rehana Patel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard a preliminary time-limit issue only. Miss Patel’s employment ended on 30 January 2019, but her tribunal claim was not presented until 25 July 2020. The tribunal therefore considered whether to extend time for the unfair dismissal claim under the "reasonably practicable" test and for the Equality Act claims on a "just and equitable" basis.
The tribunal accepted that Miss Patel had ongoing mental health difficulties, depression, anxiety and chronic pain after her employment ended, but found that the later psychiatric report overstated the extent of her incapacity during 2019 and the first half of 2020. It found she had difficulty motivating herself and that her health problems contributed to delay, but not to the extent that she was unable to bring a claim for the whole period. The tribunal also found she had no intention of bringing proceedings until counselling in late 2019 prompted her to seek "closure", and that she then pursued the matter without urgency.
In relation to the Equality Act claims, the tribunal distinguished between earlier reasonable-adjustment complaints, which appeared relatively coherent and documented, and later bullying-related allegations, which would depend more heavily on recollection and would cause greater prejudice to the respondent if allowed to proceed after substantial delay. Taking the matter overall, it held that extension of time was not just and equitable. Applying the stricter unfair dismissal test, it also held that it had been reasonably practicable for Miss Patel to present that claim in time, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction and dismissed all claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because it was not presented within the time limit in s111(2) ERA 1996, and the tribunal declined to extend time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Equality Act claims were dismissed as out of time under s123(1). The judgment discusses reasonable adjustments and disability-related bullying allegations; it also notes there may have been a sex-related claim, but that was not clearly determined as a distinct pleaded claim. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s123(1) Equality Act 2010
- s111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- just and equitable extension
- reasonably practicable test
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble
- Southwark CC v Afolabi
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.