Case 2409291/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Rimmer v Forever Love Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409291/2023
- Decision date
- 14 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Rimmer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Horne found that Forever Love Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) had made an unauthorized deduction from Miss K Rimmer's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,702.19 gross in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent breached the claimant's contract of employment by failing to give notice of termination. For that breach of contract claim, the tribunal awarded damages of £288.75 gross.
The written judgment notes that the respondent is entitled to make deductions for tax and national insurance, including in relation to the breach of contract damages, which are treated as Post-Employment Notice Pay. The notice accompanying the decision states that interest would be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sums are not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, but the judgment itself does not set out a separate interest amount.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent made an unauthorized deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,702.19. | Upheld | — | £1,702 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached the contract of employment by failing to give notice of termination and awarded damages of £288.75 gross. The judgment note states this sum is taxable as Post-Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £289 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,991
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.