Case 2409333/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Samuel Jewitt v Tuffnells Parcels Express Limited (in administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409333/2022
- Decision date
- 30 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Samuel Jewitt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Samuel Jewitt brought a claim for unlawful deduction from wages against Tuffnells Parcels Express Limited. The tribunal recorded that the claim had not been submitted within three months, plus early conciliation, of the last of a series of alleged deductions, in accordance with sections 23(2) and 23(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been submitted in time and that there was no basis to extend time under section 23(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It therefore held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the claim and dismissed it. No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal dismissed the claim because it was not submitted within the statutory time limit, it was reasonably practicable to submit it in time, and there was no basis to extend time under section 23(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- sections 23(2) and (3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.