Case 2409341/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Borbely v Mills Blinds Ltd (dissolved company) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2409341/2022
- Decision date
- 22 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe DATE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Borbely
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 28 August 2024, the tribunal gave Mr G Borbely an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated concerns were that he had not responded to the tribunal's letter dated 9 June 2023 asking him to confirm whether he had obtained a court order restoring the respondent to the Register of Companies, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Borbely did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Childe struck out the claim.
The judgment records no substantive liability findings and no monetary award. It was sent to the parties on 22 October 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the substantive cause(s) of action; it states only that 'the claim' was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.