Case 2409370/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Currie v Hilbre Care Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2409370/2020
- Decision date
- 16 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Currie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed for a final hearing on 3 October 2023. The claimant and respondent both failed to attend, and neither was represented. The tribunal noted that a case management order sent on 16 September 2021 had informed the parties of the hearing date, venue, and the requirement to attend in person.
The respondent was in creditors’ voluntary liquidation, with liquidators appointed in September 2022 and the respondent’s representatives coming off record in March 2023. The tribunal noted that the claimant had not appeared to make contact with the tribunal between 2021 and the hearing date, and there was no telephone number on the case record or paper file. The clerk emailed the claimant on the morning of the hearing; she replied that she was sorry and had received a phone call saying the matter was not being taken any further because Della McManus had retired and sold all her businesses.
Applying Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 and the overriding objective in Rule 2, the tribunal said it had made all practicable enquiries into the claimant’s absence. It concluded that the claimant appeared to have given up, that enforcement against the company would in any event appear to have limited prospects, and that dismissing the claim would be proportionate. The judgment therefore dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismissed the claim under Rule 47 after neither party attended the final hearing; it did not determine the merits of any breach of contract issue. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismissed the claim under Rule 47 after neither party attended the final hearing; it did not determine the merits of any unfair dismissal issue. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment dismissed the claim under Rule 47 after neither party attended the final hearing; it did not determine the merits of any working time issue. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 2 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.