Case 2409380/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Patel (2409380/2023 and 2409382/2023); Miss E Shaw (2409521/2023); Mrs G P Chapman (2409523/2023). v Simon Holroyd and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2409380/2023
- Decision date
- 3 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Case
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs H Patel (2409380/2023 and 2409382/2023); Miss E Shaw (2409521/2023); Mrs G P Chapman (2409523/2023).
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondents failed to present a valid response on time and the Employment Judge proceeded to make a determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. All claims against the first respondent, Simon Holroyd, were dismissed, and claim 2409380/2023 was dismissed as a duplicate. The tribunal found that the claimants had been dismissed from their employment with the second respondent, Scan House Summarisation Limited, on 2 June 2023.
The claims against the second respondent succeeded as set out in the Annex. Mrs Patel (2409382/2023) was awarded £2,780 in total, comprising £260 for unauthorised wage deductions, £1,200 damages for breach of contract regarding notice, £120 for accrued holiday entitlement, and a £1,200 redundancy payment. Mrs Chapman was awarded £378 in total (£189 notice damages and £189 holiday entitlement). Miss Shaw was awarded £777.69 in total (£450 notice damages and £327.69 holiday entitlement).
A notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was issued, recording the relevant decision day as 2 April 2024, the calculation day as 3 April 2024, and the stipulated rate of interest as 8%.
Claims and outcomes
10 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mrs Patel (2409382/2023): second respondent ordered to pay £260 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £260 |
| Breach of contract | Mrs Patel (2409382/2023): dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £1200 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
| Holiday pay | Mrs Patel (2409382/2023): failure to pay accrued holiday entitlement (one day); £120 gross. | Upheld | — | £120 |
| Redundancy | Mrs Patel (2409382/2023): dismissed by reason of redundancy; entitled to redundancy payment of £1200. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
| Breach of contract | Mrs G Chapman (2409523/2023): dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £189 gross. | Upheld | — | £189 |
| Holiday pay | Mrs G Chapman (2409523/2023): failure to pay accrued holiday entitlement (a week, on basis of 3-day working week); £189 gross. | Upheld | — | £189 |
| Breach of contract | Miss E Shaw (2409521/2023): dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £450 gross. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,936
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
- section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.