Case 2409406/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Matthew Gresty, Georgian Gates and Railings Limited v Ms J Dunn — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409406/2022
- Decision date
- 16 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Matthew Gresty, Georgian Gates and Railings Limited
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent worked in HR and payroll for the claimant's gate company from 20 December 2021 to 10 August 2022. She was dismissed for gross misconduct on 10 August 2022. Her own tribunal claims in case 2406507/2022 had already been struck out after non-attendance. This counterclaim then proceeded without a response from the respondent, and judgment was issued under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that the respondent had increased her salary from £25,000 to £37,500 without authority, resulting in an overpayment of wages of £4,192.43. It also accepted that she had paid herself an unauthorised bonus of £250. The tribunal further found that, on termination, she had over-taken annual leave: she had taken 24 days, had accrued 9.8 days, and therefore owed £1,365.33 in respect of 14.2 days' leave.
On expenses, the written reasons state that the respondent had not reimbursed breakfast expenses of £59.28 and had used the claimant's credit card without authority to pay for LinkedIn subscriptions costing £161.97. The order records a single award of £221.25 for overpayment of expenses. The judgment therefore awarded the claimant a total of £6,029.01, and the notice appended to the decision stated that interest would accrue from 17 October 2023 at 8% per annum if the sums remained unpaid after 14 days, subject to the usual exclusions for costs or expenses.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Tribunal found the respondent had increased her salary from £25,000 to £37,500 without the claimant's authority, causing an overpayment of wages. | Upheld | — | £4,192 |
| Breach of contract | Tribunal found the respondent had paid herself a bonus of £250 without the claimant's authority. | Upheld | — | £250 |
| Breach of contract | Tribunal found the respondent had taken 24 days annual leave during employment, had accrued 9.8 days, and was therefore overpaid for 14.2 days' leave on termination. | Upheld | — | £1,365 |
| Breach of contract | The written reasons refer to breakfast expenses of £59.28 and LinkedIn subscriptions of £161.97; the order records a single award of £221.25 for overpayment of expenses. | Upheld | — | £221 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,029
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.