Case 2409426/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Styles v Caro Short Stay Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2409426/2020
- Decision date
- 24 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Styles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment in Ms S Styles v Caro Short Stay Limited, Employment Judge Batten ordered the respondent to pay £2,120.00 for an unauthorised deduction from wages, £348.49 in damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice, and £536.68 for unpaid holiday entitlement. The judgment records these as gross sums and does not set out any contested evidence or fuller reasoning beyond the awards made.
The attached notice set out the standard interest position under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990. It recorded that if the sums remained unpaid 14 days after the relevant decision day of 23 August 2021, interest would accrue from 24 August 2021 at 8%. No separate quantified interest figure appears in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,120 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages. | Upheld | — | £348 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £537 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,005
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.