Case 2409428/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Smith v CS Car & Van Sales Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2409428/2022
- Decision date
- 17 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the claim. Employment Judge Cookson recorded that the tribunal wrote to the claimant on 18 March 2024 requiring further information, sent a reminder on 7 April 2024, and then by letter dated 26 April 2024 gave him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not reply to any of those letters.
Because the claimant made no representations in writing, made no sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing, the tribunal struck out the claim. The hearing fixed for 20 May 2024 did not take place. The judgment was sent to the parties on 17 May 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive cause of action; it records only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. The GOV.UK listing for the case categorises it as unlawful deduction from wages. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.