Case 2409429/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Johnson v Saughall Preschool — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409429/2023
- Decision date
- 29 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal amended the respondent’s title to Saughall Preschool, reflecting its official corporate title. It then found that Mrs L Johnson was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment.
The judgment records the redundancy payment at £12,852.00. No separate breakdown into basic award, compensatory award, or other heads of loss is given in the judgment text supplied. The decision is dated 20 December 2023 and was sent to the parties on 29 December 2023.
The accompanying interest notice explains that interest may be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sum is not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day. It identifies 29 December 2023 as the relevant decision day and 30 December 2023 as the calculation day, but it does not state any interest amount in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment in this sum. The respondent title was amended to Saughall Preschool. | Upheld | — | £12,852 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,852
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.