Case 2409435/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Johnson & others (see schedule) v Singleton’s Dairy Limited (in Administration) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409435/2022
- Decision date
- 20 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr G Johnson & others (see schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the complaints seeking a protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 were well founded. It found that the first respondent had failed in its duty to consult the claimants under section 188 of that Act.
The judgment ordered the first respondent to pay each claimant identified in the schedule remuneration for the protected period of 90 days starting on 22 August 2022. The extracted text does not set out a separate monetary figure for each claimant or a single total award.
The judgment also states that the recoupment regulations apply. The proceedings were dealt with under Rule 21, and the extract includes a certificate of correction amending one claimant's name from Sebastian Lath to Sebastian Lach.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under section 189 TULR(C)A 1992; the judgment does not quantify a cash sum in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.188 TULR(C)A 1992
- s.189 TULR(C)A 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.