Case 2409483/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Kayleigh Maguire v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2409483/2020
- Decision date
- 27 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Kayleigh Maguire
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was dismissed following a national retail management restructuring in which level 2 managers were assessed for level 3 roles. The tribunal accepted redundancy as the reason for dismissal and rejected challenges that the national selection criteria were inherently too subjective or that allowing the store manager to conduct much of the process without a people manager made the process unfair in itself.
The tribunal found no bias or bad faith by the store manager and was not satisfied that the claimant had been unjustifiably underscored. It also found that anomalous scores for two other managers were errors but did not affect the claimant's outcome, and that another manager's additional role preference did not disadvantage her.
The tribunal did find unfairness in the respondent's failure to give the claimant complete and accurate information about the expedited route for challenging her scoring after the provisional outcome. However, it held that the later appeal was conducted with significant attention and care, included a faithful rescoring exercise, and remedied that unfairness. The dismissal for redundancy was therefore within the range of reasonable responses and the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant experienced some unfairness in the original dismissal process, specifically incomplete and inaccurate information about how to challenge her scoring, but held that this was remedied on appeal and the complaint failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Polkey
- Williams and Ors v Compair Maxam Ltd
- Taskforce (Finishing & Handling) Ltd v Love
- Gwynedd Council v Barrat
- Mitchells of Lancaster (Brewers) Ltd v Tattersall
- Mental Health Care (UK) Ltd v Biluan
- Lloyd v Taylor Woodrow Construction
- Whitbread and Co plc v Mills
- Taylor v OCS Group Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.