Case 2409501/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Woodcock v Beech Hill Hotel Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409501/2022
- Decision date
- 1 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Poynton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Woodcock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Poynton sat alone at Manchester ET by CVP on 14 February 2023. The tribunal substituted Beech Hill Hotel Limited as respondent under rule 34, recording that the originally named respondent, Jonathan Allan, was the claimant's supervisor and that the substituted respondent was the correct employer title.
The only substantive claim recorded in the judgment was for unauthorised deduction of wages. The tribunal held that the claim was not well founded and dismissed it. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and therefore no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that Beech Hill Hotel Limited was substituted as respondent under rule 34 because the originally named respondent, Jonathan Allan, was the claimant's supervisor rather than his employer. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.