Case 2409501/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Kumar v Advanced Oncotherapy plc HELD AT: Manchester — 2024
- Case reference
- 2409501/2023
- Decision date
- 11 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Kumar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend the hearing and had admitted in section 6.1 of its ET3, presented on 30 November 2023, that it would not dispute the claimant's claim.
On the information in the claim form, the Tribunal found unpaid salary for May to September 2023 in the gross sum of £10,034.91. It ordered the respondent to pay that sum in settlement of the original complaints of unlawful deduction from wages.
The claimant had also applied to amend the claim to update losses arising after the original claim form. The Tribunal did not determine that application in this judgment because the respondent had not had an opportunity to consider it in good time before the preliminary hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent admitted in its ET3 that it would not dispute the claim. The judgment records unpaid salary for May to September 2023 and orders payment in settlement of the original complaints of unlawful deduction from wages. A later amendment application for updated losses was not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | £10,035 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,035
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.