Case 2409508/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Callaghan v Cumberland Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 2409508/2023
- Decision date
- 30 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley
- Venue
- Carlisle
- Panel members
- Ms K Fulton, Dr B Tirohl
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Callaghan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Callaghan brought disability discrimination complaints against Cumberland Council. The Tribunal, sitting at Carlisle before Employment Judge Eeley, Ms K Fulton and Dr B Tirohl, heard the case on 23 to 27 September 2024.
The written judgment records that the complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was not well-founded and was dismissed. It also records that the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability was not well-founded and was dismissed.
No monetary remedy, injury to feelings award, interest, or other award is recorded in the written judgment. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint described in the judgment as unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint described in the judgment as failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.