Case 2409526/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Brough v Miles Fox (Haulage) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409526/2022
- Decision date
- 20 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grundy REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Brough
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Brough brought two unlawful deduction from wages complaints against Miles Fox (Haulage) Limited: one about meal allowance payments and one about holiday pay. Employment Judge Grundy found there was no signed written contract for the relevant period, so the tribunal relied on the parties' oral dealings, conduct, and custom and practice.
On meal allowances, the tribunal accepted the respondent's evidence that the allowance was only payable when a Class 1 driver worked 10 hours. It found the relevant rate was £120 per day, with a £10 taxable meal allowance and a £10 non-taxable payment on qualifying days, and it rejected the claimant's case that he was entitled to £140 per day or to the allowance on every shift. On that basis, the tribunal held that no unauthorised deduction was shown for the shifts under 10 hours that were in issue.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that the respondent had not included meal allowance sums in its averaging calculation. It held that the allowances formed part of the claimant's normal pay when earned, so they had to be included in the holiday pay calculation. The tribunal therefore upheld the holiday pay complaint to that extent and directed the respondent to recalculate holiday pay by 13 October 2023, with the parties to report by 1 November 2023 whether any sums remained outstanding or whether a further hearing was needed. No final monetary award was fixed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the meal allowance was only payable when the claimant worked 10 hours, so the claimant was not entitled to payment on the under-10-hour shifts relied on. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that meal allowance amounts paid on qualifying days had to be included in the holiday pay averaging calculation. No final monetary sum was fixed; the respondent was directed to recalculate holiday pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- British Airways plc v Williams [2012] ICR 847
- Hertel (UK) Ltd v Wood / Bear Scotland v Fulton [2015] ICR 221
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.