Case 2409533/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Owen v Irvings Butchers Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2409533/2020
- Decision date
- 22 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Owen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 10 August 2022 before Employment Judge Slater, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr S Walker, solicitor, the tribunal gave an oral judgment. The written record states that Mrs G Owen was disabled at relevant times by reason of a physical impairment, namely Chronic Kidney Disease.
The decision notice was sent to the parties on 22 August 2022. It also records that written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's notice. The extracted text contains no further finding on liability for the underlying discrimination or unfair dismissal claims and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment records a preliminary finding that the claimant was disabled at relevant times by reason of Chronic Kidney Disease. The extracted text does not record final liability or remedy on any substantive claim. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.