Case 2409583/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Yacine Haliti v Sismek Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409583/2022
- Decision date
- 15 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cline
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Yacine Haliti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Cline, sitting alone in Manchester on 13 March 2023, found that Sismek Limited had failed to pay Mr Yacine Haliti's holiday entitlement. The judgment records a single successful claim for unpaid holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations context listed for the case.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay Mr Haliti the gross sum of £750 within 14 days of the date the judgment was sent to the parties. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
The accompanying interest notice states that interest would be payable if the sum was not paid in full within 14 days after the written record was sent, with the relevant decision day recorded as 15 March 2023 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum. No separate interest figure is stated in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the Respondent failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £750. | Upheld | — | £750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £750
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.