Case 2409583/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S A Coogan v BSK (NW) Ltd and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2409583/2023
- Decision date
- 26 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr S A Coogan
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent under Rule 64 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal ordered the first respondent, BSK (NW) Ltd, to pay Mr S A Coogan £1,614 for two weeks' notice pay and £419.64 for 2.6 days' unpaid holiday pay. The first respondent accepted that both sums were due to the claimant.
The judgment states that the sums are to be paid forthwith. The attached interest notice explains that, if the award is not paid in full within 14 days after the relevant decision day, interest may accrue at the stipulated rate of 8% from 26 March 2024. No separate amount of interest was quantified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Judgment by consent under Rule 64 ordered the first respondent to pay two weeks' notice pay of £1,614. The first respondent accepted that this sum was due to the claimant. | Settled | — | £1,614 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment by consent under Rule 64 ordered the first respondent to pay £419.64 for 2.6 days' unpaid holiday pay. The first respondent accepted that this sum was due to the claimant. | Settled | — | £420 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,034
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.