Case 2409584/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Jones v Pennine Manufacturing Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2409584/2020
- Decision date
- 25 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hill REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment in Case No. 2409584/2020 heard at Manchester by CVP on 5 March 2021 before Employment Judge Hill. The claimant was Mr D Jones and the respondent was Pennine Manufacturing Limited, represented respectively by Counsel and the respondent’s director.
The Tribunal’s only recorded determination was that the Respondent’s breach of contract claim was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment also states that the claim was dismissed. No separate monetary award was made or recorded in the decision.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further factual findings or legal issues are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal struck out the Respondent’s breach of contract claim as having no reasonable prospect of success and recorded that it was dismissed. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.