Case 2409591/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Dr L Fasano v Manchester Private Clinic Limited (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2409591/2020
- Decision date
- 1 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr L Fasano
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Batten sat alone at Manchester on 26 February 2021. The respondent did not attend, and the judgment records that Dr L Fasano appeared in person. The tribunal found that Manchester Private Clinic Limited (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) had dismissed the claimant in breach of contract and ordered compensation for the remainder of his notice entitlement in the net sum of £9,726.90.
The tribunal also ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,399.99 for unpaid accrued holiday entitlement due at the termination of employment. In addition, it found that the claimant had been subjected to a detriment for making protected disclosures and awarded £10,000.00 for injury to feelings in respect of that detriment.
The judgment contains separate monetary awards for the breach of contract, holiday pay, and whistleblowing detriment findings. The overall sums awarded in the judgment total £22,126.89 before any question of interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, which is referred to in the notice appended to the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded as compensation for the remainder of the claimant's notice entitlement, stated as the net sum of £9,726.90. | Upheld | — | £9,727 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as the gross sum of £2,399.99 for unpaid accrued holiday entitlement due at termination. | Upheld | — | £2,400 |
| Whistleblowing | Awarded as £10,000.00 for injury to feelings in respect of the detriment the claimant was subjected to for making protected disclosures. | Upheld | — | £10,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,127
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £9,727
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.