Case 2409591/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Carragher v Chantal Broadhurst T/a No.1 Parkgate — 2024
- Case reference
- 2409591/2023
- Decision date
- 24 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Carragher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr W Carragher, did not attend or be represented at the hearing on 10 April 2024. The respondent, Chantal Broadhurst t/a No.1 Parkgate, had not submitted a response and was not entitled to defend the claim pursuant to Regulation 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Enquiries were made about the claimant's absence, but no contact could be made and no request to postpone or explanation for the non-attendance had been received. Employment Judge Howard therefore dismissed the claim pursuant to Regulation 47 of the ET(C&RP) Regulations 2013. The dismissed heads recorded in the judgment were unlawful deduction from wages, unpaid accrued holiday, and failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars and itemised pay statements.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed pursuant to Regulation 47 ET(C&RP) Regs 2013 after the claimant failed to attend or be represented. The respondent had not submitted a response and was not entitled to defend the claim pursuant to Regulation 21 ET(C&RP) Regs 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for unpaid accrued holiday was dismissed on the same basis under Regulation 47 ET(C&RP) Regs 2013 following the claimant's non-attendance. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | This entry covers the claim for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars and itemised pay statements. It was dismissed pursuant to Regulation 47 ET(C&RP) Regs 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Regulation 21 ET(C&RP) Regs 2013
- Regulation 47 ET(C&RP) Regs 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.