Case 2409594/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Kinsella v Goldman Knightly Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2409594/2020
- Decision date
- 11 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Kinsella
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting alone, struck out Miss N Kinsella's claim against Goldman Knightly Ltd. By a letter dated 29 November 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The reasons recorded were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 13 October 2021 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The Tribunal noted that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing in response to that letter.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. It also recorded that the hearing listed for 20 to 23 February 2023 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying legal claim type in the extracted text. It records that 'the claim is struck out' because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 13 October 2021 and had not actively pursued the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.