Case 2409598/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Bishop v Legal Answers Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409598/2022
- Decision date
- 10 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Hunt Representation
- Venue
- Manchester- via virtual region CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Bishop
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss R Bishop brought a claim against Legal Answers Ltd for unauthorised deduction from wages. Employment Judge K Hunt, sitting in Manchester by CVP on 8 March 2023, held that the claim was well founded.
The tribunal found that the respondent made an unlawful deduction in respect of 8 days' wages, described as 56 hours, and ordered payment of £560 gross, subject to deductions for tax and NICs. It also found an unlawful deduction in respect of pay in lieu of 13 days' accrued but untaken holiday due on termination, described as 91 hours, and ordered payment of £910 gross, subject to deductions for tax and NICs. The judgment does not record any other substantive claims or any split remedy beyond those two sums.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and found two unlawful deductions: 8 days' wages (56 hours) and pay in lieu of 13 days' accrued but untaken holiday (91 hours) due on termination. | Upheld | — | £1,470 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,470
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.