Case 2409605/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Harris v Falcon-Care Blackburn — 2024
- Case reference
- 2409605/2023
- Decision date
- 26 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Harris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 11 January 2024, the Tribunal gave Ms D Harris an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out because she had failed to comply with the direction contained in Employment Judge Holmes's letter of 26 November 2023 and because the matter had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge M Butler ordered that the claim be struck out.
The judgment records that the hearing listed for 12 February 2024 would not take place. No merits findings or monetary award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out after the claimant failed to make representations, or failed to make sufficient representations, in response to the Tribunal's 11 January 2024 letter; the Tribunal said this followed non-compliance with the direction in Employment Judge Holmes's letter of 26 November 2023 and failure to actively pursue the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.