Case 2409629/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Sayeed v Department for Work and Pensions — 2022
- Case reference
- 2409629/2020
- Decision date
- 17 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Sayeed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's Order dated 26 April 2022.
The claimant sought an extension on 11 May 2022 for medical reasons, but the Tribunal recorded that he had not provided the matters requested in the Unless Order within the 14 days he had requested. The Tribunal found that he had failed to make written representations, or sufficient representations, as to why strike out should not occur, and had not requested a hearing.
The hearing listed for 20 July 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole; it does not set out the individual allegations. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole; it does not set out the individual allegations. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole; it does not set out the individual allegations. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole; it does not set out the individual allegations. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole; it does not set out the individual allegations. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.