Case 2409631/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Williams v Blackpool Laundry Company Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2409631/2020
- Decision date
- 20 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Whittaker REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Williams claimed disability discrimination against Blackpool Laundry Company Ltd. The tribunal first addressed whether he was disabled during the material dates of 20 to 30 March 2020 by reason of asthma. It accepted that the relevant issue was that period, not the date of the hearing, and explained that the claimant had initially confused the timing of the disability assessment.
The tribunal found that any impact Mr Williams experienced during that period was attributable to COVID-related restrictions and anxiety about COVID, not to asthma. It accepted that he suffered some asthma attacks on 28, 29 and 30 March 2020, but found that they were not serious enough to require medical advice and were resolved using his inhaler. The medical evidence described the overall picture as mild asthma, and there was no evidence that asthma caused substantial effects on normal day-to-day activities during the material period.
Looking at the period before March 2020, the tribunal noted that the claimant's last annual asthma review was in September 2016, that he had received no treatment save for very occasional chest infections, and that from August 2019 until dismissal he worked long hours in a warm, damp laundry environment without sickness absence or asthma-related effects on day-to-day activities. It also accepted his evidence that any issues before he joined the respondent were minimal and that, by the end of March 2020, he had had no real problems with asthma.
The tribunal concluded that asthma did not have a substantial or long-term adverse effect on Mr Williams's normal day-to-day activities during 20 to 30 March 2020, so he was not disabled at the material time. His disability discrimination claims were therefore dismissed, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that Mr Williams was not disabled during the material period of 20 to 30 March 2020 by reason of asthma, so his disability discrimination claims failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 6
- substantial or long-term adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.