Case 2409632/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Welsh v S&T Communications (in compulsory liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2409632/2023
- Decision date
- 24 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Welsh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the merits of any substantive employment claim. It recorded that the respondent company, S&T Communications (in compulsory liquidation), was subject to the Insolvency Act 1986 and that permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued.
On 12 September 2024 the tribunal gave the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No financial award or other remedy was recorded. The judgment was sent to the parties on 24 October 2024 and is signed by Employment Judge McDonald on 21 October 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. It states that the respondent was in compulsory liquidation, that permission of the court had not been obtained under the Insolvency Act 1986, and that the claimant did not give an acceptable reason after being given 14 days to do so. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.