Case 2409634/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Angela Meanley v Stateside Foods Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2409634/2023
- Decision date
- 25 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rhodes
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Ms L Atkinson, Mrs C Titherington
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Angela Meanley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 21 and 22 October 2024, Employment Judge Rhodes, sitting with Ms L Atkinson and Mrs C Titherington, decided that Angela Meanley's complaint of disability discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed. Her complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded.
The written record states that the issue of remedy was stayed for 21 days until 12 November 2024 pending payment by the respondent of a sum agreed between the parties. If payment was made, the file was to be closed; if not, the parties were to ask for the stay to be lifted and for the matter to be listed for a remedy hearing. No final monetary award is recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written record states only that the complaint of disability discrimination was 'not well-founded' and dismissed; no oral reasons are reproduced in this record. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Liability succeeded, but the written record does not set out a final monetary award because remedy was stayed pending payment of a sum agreed between the parties. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.