Case 2409650/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Johnson v Manchester Mind — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409650/2022
- Decision date
- 27 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that it did not have jurisdiction to determine Mr M Johnson's unfair dismissal claim pursuant to s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996, and the claim was struck out. The judgment does not record any merits determination on that claim.
The claimant's indirect disability discrimination claim under s.19 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to determine the claimant's unfair dismissal claim pursuant to s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996 and struck it out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claimant's indirect disability discrimination claim pursuant to s.19 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.19 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.