Case 2409654/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Migon v Chris Edmondson Cleaning Company Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409654/2022
- Decision date
- 15 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Migon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 17 May 2023, the Tribunal gave Miss Migon an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the order dated 11 April 2023 and because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make sufficient written representations, or did not make any representations at all, to resist strike out, and the Tribunal noted that any purported compliance after the 17 May 2023 letter was not sufficient.
The Tribunal also recorded that the claimant did not attend the hearing listed to consider whether her claim was in time. In light of the failure to comply with the earlier order and the lack of active pursuit, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records the strike out order only and does not determine the merits of any substantive claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded causes of action. The claim was struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 11 April 2023 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.