Case 2409670/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Otunba-Payne v Innovate Agriculture Technologies Limited and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2409670/2023
- Decision date
- 20 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms G Otunba-Payne
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Phil Allen sat alone at Manchester by CVP on 6-7 February 2025. The written judgment records that, at the material time, the claimant was an employee of the first respondent and was engaged as its worker. It also records that she was neither employed under a contract of employment nor engaged as a worker by the second respondent, so all claims against the second respondent were dismissed.
The tribunal upheld the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages against the first respondent for the period 1 March 2023 to 1 April 2024 and ordered payment of £89.60, described in the judgment as the gross sum deducted. It also upheld the holiday pay complaint against the first respondent, finding that ten days' accrued but untaken annual leave had not been paid as required by the Working Time Regulations 1998, and ordered payment of £2,942.39.
The tribunal dismissed the claim for holiday pay so far as it related to previous holiday years, prior to 2024 save for three days carried over. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. A standard interest notice was attached, stating that the relevant decision day was 20 February 2025 and that interest would run at 8% per annum from 21 February 2025 if the award was not paid within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Against the first respondent; unauthorised deductions from wages in the period 1 March 2023 to 1 April 2024. | Upheld | — | £90 |
| Holiday pay | Against the first respondent; failure to pay ten days' accrued but untaken annual leave under the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £2,942 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay relating to previous holiday years (prior to 2024, save for three days carried over) was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,032
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.