Case 2409726/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Jones v Jasmine Holcroft t/a La Beautique — 2020
- Case reference
- 2409726/2020
- Decision date
- 26 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment in default because the respondent did not present a response within the appropriate period. On that basis, it held that Miss L Jones’s claim for unlawful deduction of wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded and ordered payment of £813.84, subject to lawful deductions of tax and national insurance.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had not been paid accrued holiday pay. It accepted that 73.5 hours of statutory accrued holiday remained unpaid for the period 1 January 2020 to 10 July 2020, the effective date of termination, and ordered £735.00 at £10 per hour gross, again less lawful deductions of tax and national insurance.
In addition, the tribunal found that the claimant had not been provided with a statement of terms and conditions of employment in accordance with section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It awarded compensation equivalent to 4 weeks’ gross pay, assessed at £1,000.00. The notice on interest stated that sums payable under the judgment would carry interest if unpaid 14 days after the relevant decision day, which was recorded as 26 November 2020, at the stipulated rate of 8%.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction of wages under s.13 ERA 1996 and ordered payment of £813.84, less lawful deductions of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £814 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found unpaid accrued holiday pay totalling 73.5 hours. It ordered £735.00, less lawful deductions of tax and national insurance, at £10 per hour gross for 1 January 2020 to 10 July 2020. | Upheld | — | £735 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent had not provided a statement of terms and conditions of employment in accordance with s.1 ERA 1996 and awarded compensation of 4 weeks' gross pay, £1,000.00. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,549
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.1 ERA 1996
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.