Case 2409767/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T P McEvilly (1) Mr M Quinn (2) Mr A Lucass (3) v McLaughlin Contractors Ltd and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409767/2022
- Decision date
- 24 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr T P McEvilly (1) Mr M Quinn (2) Mr A Lucass (3)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard three linked claims brought by Mr T P McEvilly, Mr M Quinn and Mr A Lucass. It found that they were employees of McLaughlin Contractors Limited and that their employment ended on 22 July 2022 after the death of the sole director, Mr Robert Alexander McLaughlin, when the business ceased to operate. The second claimant did not attend the final hearing and had not engaged with the proceedings.
The main issue was whether the claimants had agreed to leave and take alternative work with a contractor known as Fargo. The tribunal accepted that Mr McLaughlin had discussed trying to secure alternative employment before his death, but it did not accept that the first and third claimants had agreed to resign or that any alternative arrangement had been put in place. It found that the employment ended because the need for their work ceased, and that this was a redundancy situation with no suitable alternative vacancies offered.
Applying the redundancy provisions of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal held that the first claimant had 15 years' service and was entitled to £10,191 redundancy pay. It also awarded him £5,688 gross notice pay on his breach of contract claim, making £15,879 in total. The third claimant had 21 completed years' service and succeeded on his redundancy pay claim for £16,166. The second claimant's claim was dismissed for failure to pursue it, the claims against the second respondent were dismissed because it was not the employer at the material time, and the proposed amendments to add claims about written particulars and written pay statements were withdrawn and dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | First claimant; redundancy payment awarded on the basis of 15 years' service and age 55 at dismissal. | Upheld | — | £10,191 |
| Breach of contract | First claimant; gross notice pay awarded as a breach of contract claim. | Upheld | — | £5,688 |
| Redundancy | Second claimant failed to attend the final hearing and failed to pursue his claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Third claimant; redundancy payment awarded on the basis of 21 completed years' service and age 60 at dismissal. | Upheld | — | £16,166 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £32,045
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.139 ERA 1996
- s.155 ERA 1996
- s.145 ERA 1996
- s.163 ERA 1996
- s.162 ERA 1996
- s.141 ERA 1996
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994
- Delaney v Staples 1992 ICR 483 HL
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.