Case 2409795/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Pedder v Limitless Send Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2409795/2022
- Decision date
- 9 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Pedder
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out the claim against Limitless Send Ltd (in compulsory liquidation). The tribunal noted that the respondent company was in compulsory liquidation and that permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also recorded that on 27 November 2024 it had given the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason in response.
For those reasons, Employment Judge Tobin ordered that the claim be struck out. No liability findings or monetary remedy were made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' being struck out and does not separately identify claim heads; this claim type is taken from the case listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' being struck out and does not separately identify claim heads; this claim type is taken from the case listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.