Case 2409852/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Megan Liddle v Nicola Morris t/a Medlock Day Nursery — 2024
- Case reference
- 2409852/2022
- Decision date
- 11 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Megan Liddle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMegan Liddle’s claim against Nicola Morris t/a Medlock Day Nursery was listed for a hearing at Liverpool by video on 24 May 2024 before Employment Judge Benson. The claimant did not attend to pursue her claim, while the respondent attended in person.
The tribunal recorded that it had made such enquiries as were practicable and considered all available information, including that the claimant had not attended the previously listed final hearing and that the notice of hearing had been sent to her at the correct address.
In those circumstances, the tribunal dismissed the claim pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment gives no merits findings and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the pleaded claim in the extracted text; the case listing category was unlawful deduction from wages. The claim was dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.