Case 2410000/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A A Mohamed v The Best Connection Employment Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2410000/2019
- Decision date
- 23 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A A Mohamed
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 19 November 2019, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant had brought complaints of unfair dismissal and race discrimination. The unfair dismissal complaint was proposed for strike out because the claimant had been employed for less than two years. The tribunal relied on section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and concluded that, because the claimant had less than two years' service, he was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint.
The race discrimination complaint was proposed for strike out on two bases: that it had not been actively pursued, because the claimant failed to attend a preliminary hearing on 15 November 2019, and that it had no reasonable prospect of success because the claim form gave no information on which a tribunal could conclude that the claimant had been subjected to unlawful race discrimination by the respondent. The tribunal struck out the claim on that basis, so the whole claim was struck out by Employment Judge Slater on 18 December 2019 and sent to the parties on 23 December 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service; the tribunal said section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996 required not less than two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Struck out because the complaint had not been actively pursued after the claimant failed to attend the preliminary hearing on 15 November 2019, and because the claim form gave no information from which the tribunal could conclude that unlawful race discrimination had occurred. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.