Case 2410001/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Newcombe v Service 2 Retail Ltd (in company voluntary arrangement) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2410001/2019
- Decision date
- 19 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Newcombe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr K Newcombe, brought claims against Service 2 Retail Ltd (in company voluntary arrangement). The respondent did not attend and was not represented. Employment Judge Horne gave oral reasons at the hearing held in Liverpool on 14 November 2019.
The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,575.00. It also found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages in relation to the final two weeks of the claimant's employment, and ordered payment of £256.00, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's accrued holiday pay and ordered payment of £737.33, also subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. The written judgment does not record any other substantive remedies beyond those sums.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,575 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded for the final two weeks of employment, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £256 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded in respect of accrued holiday pay, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £737 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,568
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.