Case 2410027/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Joseph v Kingdom Security Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410027/2019
- Decision date
- 17 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Joseph
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Kingdom Security Limited made a series of unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in the period from 3 May 2019 until 16 March 2020. It found no unauthorised deduction from wages after 16 March 2020.
The respondent was ordered to pay Mr E Joseph the gross sum of £23,053.11 in respect of the total amount unlawfully deducted. The judgment records that the respondent may make any deductions for tax and national insurance contributions it is required to make before paying the net balance. The written judgment does not set out any separate award for interest or any other head of loss.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a series of unauthorised deductions from wages between 3 May 2019 and 16 March 2020, and found no unauthorised deduction after 16 March 2020. The respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £23,053.11, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance required by law. | Upheld | — | £23,053 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £23,053
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.