Mr M King v Richard Tinsley Limited — 2020

Case reference: 2410030/2019
Decision date: 11 March 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Benson Dated

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M King

Respondent

Richard Tinsley Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment records that all proceedings in Mr M King's claims against Richard Tinsley Limited were stayed until 20 March 2020 so that the parties could put into effect terms of settlement that had been agreed between them. The document does not contain any findings on liability for either the breach of contract or unfair dismissal claim.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	Proceedings were stayed to allow the parties to implement a settlement; no substantive determination of the breach of contract claim was made in this judgment. The order provided that if no application to relist was made by 20 March 2020, the claim would be dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.	Other	—	—
Unfair dismissal	Proceedings were stayed to allow the parties to implement a settlement; no substantive determination of the unfair dismissal claim was made in this judgment. The order provided that if no application to relist was made by 20 March 2020, the claim would be dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.	Other	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.