Case 2410045/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Fatoumata Coulibaly v Engage Support Limited Heard: Manchester Employment Tribunals — 2023
- Case reference
- 2410045/2022
- Decision date
- 19 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Tobin Members
- Panel members
- Ms A Berkeley-Hill, Mr A Egerton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Fatoumata Coulibaly
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Manchester Employment Tribunals hearing on 9, 10 and 11 October 2023 before Employment Judge G Tobin with members Ms A Berkeley-Hill and Mr A Egerton, the tribunal unanimously found that Miss Fatoumata Coulibaly was unfairly dismissed by Engage Support Limited, in breach of s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
The tribunal also unanimously rejected the claimant's sex discrimination claim under s.13 Equality Act 2010, finding that she was not discriminated against on grounds of sex. The judgment records that settlement was agreed between the parties and that the respondent will pay the claimant £5,836.80. The record does not break that sum down between the claims, so no separate award component is stated for either claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed in breach of s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records a settlement between the parties under which the respondent will pay £5,836.80, but the sum is not apportioned between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal found that the claimant was not discriminated against on the grounds of sex, contrary to s.13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,837
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.